The Art of an Injury

Making a comeback with Breanna Allison

Lauren Agnew 

Most athletes will tell you that they are willing to sacrifice anything for their sport; they put their bodies and minds on the line every day either for glory, sheer love of sport, or both. But what about when disaster strikes? What about when the sport you love causes you to sit on the sidelines? For X-Women Rugby Fullback Breanna Allison, this is exactly what happened. 

Allison, whose friends and teammates call her “Bre”, has been a starter for StFX since her first year in 2013. Now in her third year, Bre has been sidelined with an injury expected to keep her off the field for at least a year. In a game against the UPEI Panthers early in the 2015 season, Bre was playing her usual position of fullback at number 15 on the field. It was a perfect day for rugby, with a few clouds and no wind, and the X-Women were set to win their first game of the season. Unfortunately, a few minutes into the second half Bre was forced to make a try-saving tackle. While it was spectacular to watch from the sidelines (Bre absolutely flattened the opposing player), on the field it was a different story: “I knew something was wrong right away, “says Allison, “But to be honest I didn’t think it was too serious. It just looked swollen right away, so I assumed that when the swelling went down I would be back on the field”. 

The injury would prove to be a fully torn right ACL, an injury that is becoming increasingly common in female athletes. Bre says she was surprised when she got the results of her MRI back, saying “I didn’t hear the snap or the pop or anything they say happens when you tear your ACL. I really didn’t think it was serious”. After a three month wait to see a surgeon, the tear was finally repaired. Then came rehab. For another three months Allison was limited to using crutches to get around the icy StFX campus, an unfortunate impediment given the timing of the injury. 

Allison says she is excited to get back on the field, but also “incredibly nervous.” She explains “I feel like I’m starting at ground zero. Now that I can slowly start training again I am so far behind my other teammates. I only just got cleared to run again.” Bre adds however that this has become her main source of motivation: “I want to get back on that field and back in a jersey” and she says she will to anything it takes to get there. 

The X-Women broke a 17-year championship winning streak this year, losing the AUS title at home to Acadia. Allison says that she is “anxious to get back and help [her] teammates take back the title.” But the effects of the injury are more than physical, there is a mental side as well. Bre worries that her injury will make her hesitate more on the field: “Once I get past the first tackle it will be fine. But that first one will be tough. I need to know my body can handle it again. As soon as that first tackle is over I know I will be more than ready, it’s just more motivation to get back.” 

Recovery can be frustrating, but Bre is thankful that she has her teammates for motivation and support, and adds that she is doing everything in her power to get back to training camp in August, and on the field for her fourth, and maybe even final year of rugby as an X-Woman. At the end of the day, having a positive attitude about the process and the prospect of returning to play is what keeps Bre working hard. “I still don’t know if I’m coming back for a fifth year,” she says, “but I do know that I’m not done yet. We have another championship to win.”

Sex After Sexual Assault

How to find safety and confidence in intimacy

I remember calling my boyfriend to tell him I had been raped. We had only been dating for two and a half months, most of which was long distance. Of course, it was uncomfortable - only a month before that phone call he had been visiting me, and suddenly I’m calling him to tell him I was raped by a friend of mine. We had just really started getting to know one another and then I was not the same person. There were so many changes during that time, and approaching sex was one of them. When talking about sexual assault, it seems sex after assault is not addressed or merely glossed over. 

Recently I saw a post on YikYak where the posters were saying they did not know how to be sexual, or have sex at all since they were assaulted. This makes sense. Whether you are in a relationship or caught up a one-night thing, sex is intimate. When this trust you’ve put into someone is betrayed, in such an intimate act, it can be hard to regain that trust and your sexuality. Each person will recover in their own way, and in their own time, but I would like to share with you some things that helped me regain control over my sexuality, and hopefully help you find your own. This has not been quick, nor had it been easy, but it is important. You can be a survivor of sexual violence and be a sexual person.  

Sexuality is not only about the act of sex - it’s also about feeling confident in your body again. There is a lot of self-blame that follows sexual violence, and questions about whether or not you could have prevented it from happening. I spent a lot of time being self-conscious of my body and how it would be perceived by those around me. I wanted to feel sexy and confident but I was afraid to do so. Would it make me less of a survivor to wear sheer tops and short skirts? Could I ever safely feel sexy again? 

One night I went out to see a friend of mine DJing, and my friends and I were all really excited. But this all changed when the student who raped me was there, and spent the entire night following me around. I was dancing with my girlfriends when I felt arms around my waist and lips on my neck. He was standing behind me, touching me, and so I froze. I looked desperately at my friend who started yelling at him to leave me alone. He did not try and talk to me or touch me after that, but he continued to follow me wherever I went. 

It’s scary, haunting, frustrating and invasive, but here’s the thing -  sexual violence is never your fault. It is important to remind yourself that there was nothing you did to made it happen. So following the assault, I told myself that I would not be broken by this; I would be strong and recover and not allow my body to be controlled by him anymore. So I masturbated. Which is a weird thing to admit to an unknown number of readers, but that is how I started being sex positive again. I made my space safe and comfortable, I found my preferred entertainment, and spent some time loving myself at my own pace. When I started to feel overwhelmed, I stopped and took time to relax. If and when I felt ready, I continued. 

You know your body, so listen to it. Take time to make yourself feel physically good because you deserve to feel good. The goal is for you to rediscover sex and pleasure, so do not make it a race. After experiencing sexual violence, you feel robbed of control over your own body. Masturbation is a great way to work towards regaining the power over your own sexuality. You decide what you watch, listen to, read, or imagine, and you decide your limits. Regaining control over your sexuality is very important in finding the confidence you need to enjoy sex with a partner in the future.  

Now, for sex with a partner. I am going to operate on the assumption that any partner you choose will immediately respect your decisions and listen to your needs, because the best sex is the consensual kind. 

First, go slow and spend a lot of time in foreplay. What better way for you and your partner to prep for sex? There is communication throughout, it feels good, and it ensures that your body is physically ready for sex. Foreplay is a good time to check in with yourself (and your partner) to make sure that you are feeling up to having sex. You and your partner have the opportunity to explore one another’s bodies, discover if there are any changes in what you do and don’t like. Take your time being sexual with your partner and learning to be comfortable while being so. 

During the first few times I had sex after my assault, I felt very different. I felt like I had to be much more aware of what my boyfriend was doing and what I was feeling. Thus, is it no surprise that there was a persisting sense of anxiety. What if he got caught up in the moment? What if he didn’t stop if I needed him to? This is why I cannot stress the importance of communication enough, and to have sex only if you feel ready for it, and when you do, take it as slowly as you need. 

Remember, you can stop at any point. The moment following might be uncomfortable. You may be feeling overwhelmed and pressured. Perhaps you experienced a flashback. Your partner may be feeling guilty, responsible and concerned. But these feelings are all okay. I remember when I had a flashback once in the middle of sex.  I do not know what happened, but I opened my eyes and I did not see my boyfriend, I saw my rapist. I freaked out, started crying and shouting at him to get off of me (which he did immediately), and just rolled over and started sobbing. I felt embarrassed and scared, and he felt like he had done something to hurt me. This was so upsetting and awkward, but not the only time it happened. 

You are not to blame, nor is your partner. Please know this. Talk about it, reassure one another and take the time you need before having sex again. Triggers and flashbacks are wildly inconvenient and unpredictable. They can happen while you are walking to Nicholson Hall and in the middle of sex. And while communication will not stop them from happening, it does help. If you and your partner communicate before and throughout sex, it can make the experience much less stressful. Communication is not necessarily, “Like this? Do you want to do this? Can I do that? Hey you all good?” While it can involve asking these reassuring questions, it is also moaning and body language cues. If your partner starts tensing up and seems unsure, check in with them. Sometimes it can be hard to express something outright, and asking will let them know you are listening. Be honest with your partner - if something feels off, tell them. This is new territory for everyone involved and everyone needs honest communication in order to have a healthy sex life.

It is difficult to move on from assault, and being on such small campus makes it even harder. While you may run into them at times, you also cannot stop living life because of this person. You deserve a full life with fun nights and amazing memories with your friends. Always make sure to bring trusted friends with you. If you start to feel uncomfortable, get somewhere that you feel safe. Life will continue regardless of whether you are hiding in your room or out with your friends. Do what will make you feel safe and happy, but do live your life to its fullest. If that means watching a romantic comedy while crying into ice cream (like I did), that is perfectly fine. If it is braving the line at the pub to get funky on the dance floor with your amazing friends (I also did this), that is perfectly fine too.  

By making decisions based on what is right for you, you will find your confidence and in time reclaim your sexuality. It does not happen overnight: it takes work and patience. But when you find yourself in a place where sex is fun and pleasurable, and a night out - or in - requires less finding where the nearest exit is, and more “Holy shit I love this song,” you’ll know it has been worth it. Be sexy, sexual, and confident. Above all, be true to yourself.  

If you have been a victim of sexual violence, I urge you to talk to someone. You are not alone in this, and there are people out there who will do everything they can to help you. This was not your fault. You can get through this.  

We’ve got your back.

New Sexual Assault Policy

Some Professors Concerned with Expanded Definition of Sexualized Violence

There will soon be a new policy regarding sexual assault and sexual violence at StFX. In response to concerns about sexual assault, the university administration is proposing a new framework to define sexual assault and sexual violence and to lay out the steps that ought to be taken to respond to these cases. This new policy has been the subject of consultations with faculty and staff, and some faculty have indicated concern about the policy, including philosophy professor Christopher Byrne.

In an email circulated to all faculty, Dr. Byrne outlined his concerns with the policy. He particularly takes issue with the proposed definitions of sexual violence, which he finds far too broad. For example, part of the definition of sexual violence in the new policy reads, “Acts of sexual violence include: unwanted sexual comments or advances; coercion of another person’s sexuality by physical or psychological intimidation; and/or the denial of another person’s sexual decision-making rights.”

As Dr. Byrne writes, “The way in which the new policy defines sexual violen [...] creates a problem: sexual violence will now be defined so broadly that the type of behaviour henceforth subject to punishment will be expanded enormously, far beyond what would normally be considered to be acts of sexual violence. Some of the types of behaviour that would now count as sexual violence sound rather odd; for example, it is hard to see how sexual violence should include the denial of another person’s sexual decision-making rights (this phrase seems to suggest that we are guilty of sexual violence if we deny someone else’s request for sexual favours).”

He also questions the need for this new policy, considering that numerous policies already exist to govern the issue of sexual assault. “We already have several policies on this matter, which collectively govern the conduct of all StFX students, faculty, and staff. Why, then, do we need yet another policy on sexual assault? Why don’t we just enforce the many policies that we already have?” 

Dr. Byrne claims that there are issues with clarity in the policy, which makes it challenging to figure out what exactly constitutes sexual assault under these new rules. “In part, the new definition of sexual assault is rather obscure; violating someone else’s ‘sexual integrity’ is henceforth to be considered sexual assault, but no light is shed on just what ‘sexual integrity’ is.    Most important, among the many types of behaviour that will now count as sexual assault is exercising ‘control’ in such a way as to make someone else feel uncomfortable. In other words, doing anything that would make someone else uncomfortable is now to be considered an act of sexual assault and, therefore, sexual violence.”

In a interview with the Xaverian, Dr. Byrne expanded on this point. This new definition of sexual assault is significantly broader than the criminal code definition. According to the professor, this is a concern for students because of “the notion that if you leave StFX with a conviction of sexual assault, people are going to think of the criminal code definition of sexual assault.”

Dr. Byrne explains that the StFX administration recently informed the faculty that these new rules will only apply to students. “This is more of an issue for students; if what we were told on Wednesday [during consultations with staff] is correct, it won’t apply to faculty and staff.”

The Xaverian also reached out to Women’s and Gender studies professor Rachel Hurst to hear her point of view. She is a member of the committee that helped design the new policy on sexual assault, and she addressed several potential criticisms of the new policy via email. In the email, Dr. Hurst explains what motivated her to seek a new sexual assault policy. 

“Please note that I am not speaking on behalf of the committee, or even as a member of the committee, but rather as a concerned faculty member to whom students disclose sexual assaults, and have done so each year since I came in 2009. They have done this not only because they trust me, but because there has been a shameful lack of information and clear direction available to them on their options [after a sexual assault]. The primary purpose of the policy is to provide a resource and clear framework that spells out options for the students, who have been underserved for so long.” 

Hurst defends the new definition of sexual violence, writing, “Regarding the argument that the definition of ‘sexual violence’ is too broad/vague: In constructing this policy, we have sought out national and international research and best policy practices related to sexualized violence prevention and definitions and approaches to disclosure, reporting, and community education. All of the definitions we have used and policy conclusions we have reached are drawn from policies that have been enacted at other progressive universities in North America, and in consultation with relevant policies at StFX (notably, the Community Code and the Discrimination and Harassment Policy). Part of the challenge, of course, is that in general it is difficult for some to recognize emotional and psychological violence as ‘real’.”

Call Me What You Want

You might be an asshole, but I’m not so sensitive

A two part series. 

I have had the privilege to ring in the New Year with countless forums, discussions, and conference presentations based on the power of language and the potential for oppression via words. Although many conversations entailed the necessary eradication (or potential for re-empowerment) of racially driven, sexist, culturally insensitive terminology, the most common word presented as a topic for debate was slut. 

Slut, in its literal sense, refers to an individual who indulges in the pleasure of sex with varying partners on a frequent basis. Although currently its definition is often ignored when used, there is no doubt its initial introduction was grounded in a gender hierarchy, favouring the decisions of men. However, words and their use evolve, and the extent to which we give them power among a growingly hypersensitive bubble need to as well.

Call me a slut. The word ‘slut’ has grown to possess such minuscule value in comparison to its original meaning and is now applicable to a vast spectrum of scenarios that it’s employed arbitrarily. In fact, sometimes it can even be endearing. 

I have a close friend who primarily addresses me as, “Hey slut!” She wouldn’t casually use this term with a stranger and utters this statement as a form of humor that ultimately solidifies our relationship. 

However, when used by a man in a method to belittle my less than there outfit or my questionable back-wall dance moves, I’m still not compelled to lecture him on its origin. If slut is made to reference my sexual history then the individual’s logic is inconsistent because I am the only one with knowledge of those statistics. 

I am sure of who I am, and acknowledge that my sexual choices are distinctly disconnected from my levels of intelligence, kindness, morality and creativity. Terms like slut, whore, and ugly are not only grounded in superficiality and can only be assessed subjectively but simply put shouldn’t offend you because they aren’t a reflection of your character or influence in the world. Why isn’t it more hurtful to be called vain, vindictive, or boring? These descriptors have powerful definitions that attack an individual’s relationships and person.

So, we’re not friends and you’ve decided to call me a slut. If you’re a boy and we’re at the bar, or my personal fave, yelling it from your vehicle, thank you for helping me identify the ignorant swine lingering on the StFX campus. I now have a mental image of the cowards with whom myself and my friends should avoid romantic involvement. 

Females also like to throw the term out particularly when intoxicated or among a jealous fit, but once again, I’m left unfazed because you’ve only displayed your lack of imagination and weak vocabulary. Your suffering English lexicon has made it look as though I thrive in all other branches life with your decision to use such a meaningless word. 

If you are called a slut, do not cry or worse, whine. Laugh if said by a friend, have an intellectually stunning response if spewed by a meathead, or simply remember that that boy will not have the luxury of having sex with you. 

We need to check our priorities, be confident and orchestrate a symphony of work so loud it drowns out unworthy voices and meritless language.

President's Colloquium on Refugees

The first President’s Colloquium of 2016 was hosted in Lane Hall on Feb 2nd. The subject of the speech: the Syrian War and its resulting refugee crisis, which affects its surrounding countries and most of the European Union. The goal of the colloquium was to raise awareness of this large problem and get people involved in the issue, and it also aimed to promote a positive view on the integration of refugees into Canadian Society. 

View fullsize

Tareq Hudhud speaks about his experiences as a Syrian Refugee. Photo - Dylan Lawrence

Even though a residence may seem like an odd place to host such an event, the Pit served its purpose well and was filled to capacity. The opening speech was given by Dr. Kent MacDonald, the President of StFX. Dr. MacDonald opening with the importance of the discussion, recognizing the importance of SAFE (the Syrian-Antigonish Families Embrace), and the opening of the committee StFX for SAFE, run by Benjamin McGrath.

MacDonald praised the work of SAFE, saying, “This movement, this outreach behind our university and community, is what really makes StFX strong [and] unique”.

He went on to introduce the key speakers of the event, such as Tareq Hadhad and his family, the first Syrian refuges who have been settled in the Antigonish area, quoting Hadhad’s story as “an amazing tale of survival, and one of great humanitarian crisis that is perhaps even worse today than it was last month.” Another person of interest who opened Mr. Hadhad’s speech following Dr. Kent MacDonald’s introduction was Dr. Joseph Khoury. The StFX English Professor was actually a refugee himself, hailing from Lebanon. 

Khoury introduced Hadhad’s story by putting the refugee crisis in statistical perspective. “Syria is not a huge country. In 2013, it had the population of 22 million. That’s 22 times the population of Nova Scotia on a country that is only three times our size…and about half that population are now refugees. Of those, six million have fled Syria and six million are internally displaced…320 thousand people have been killed, or to put that into perspective, about 1 200 people a week. Of those killed, over 120 thousand are children, and 1.5 million have been wounded or permanently disabled.” He continued, drawing light on the size and scale of the refuge crisis, saying, “Six million - that’s six times the population of Nova Scotia - are without home, without food, water, medicine, or heat for the cold. The majority of these poor souls are women and children - in fact, about one half are children.” He went on to mention his past struggles as a refugee, and his escape to Canada. “We escaped, and were welcomed by the wonderful people of Ottawa, and we remain grateful.”

Tareq Hadhad took the floor afterwards, explaining his story. A young man, only 23, he was finishing his education in the field of Medicine at the University of Damascus when the war started. He explained the impact of the war on his city, and his home in the southern suburbs of Damascus. “Our whole family lived in one building. This is the Syrian kind of life. It was a peaceful life; everything was arranged to be a bright future for us all.” He continued with his perspective on the bombing of his University, which happened only three hours after his narrow escape back to the place where he grew up, and the terror he experienced, saying, “Thoughts of leaving Syria started when I came back from university...a rocket hit near us. This was the most danger me and my brother faced.” Though luckily neither Hudhud nor his brother were injured in the attack, it was a close call - one that was enough to convince him and his family to depart for Lebanon, where they would spend over a year before being accepted into Canada. As it is illegal to be a refugee in Lebanon, each day was dangerous and conditions in the camp where they stayed were poor. “The victims of Syria are those who are still there, who face the hardest of conditions,” he finished. Yet despite the adversity, Hadhad displayed a great sense of humour, and his English was quite refined for only having spent little over a month and a half in the country.  

The final part of the Colloquium emphasized the importance of action, with the overall theme of the evening being one of narrow escape and hope for humanity. “There is nothing truer than helping another human being,” Dr. Khoury said.

Those who pass by Governors Hall and Somers and Powers apartments will see that the telltale thermometer sitting on the island of grass in between the roads in and out of StFX now reads 30 thousand, with the actual number being “closer to 35”, according to Khoury. Dr. MacDonald personally put forward 5 000 dollars in StFX’s name, while Sylvia Phee of the Unifor Local 2107 mentioned the Union would also donate 5 000 dollars, with an additional 1 000 dollars from the local chapel.  

Fundraising continues for SAFE and the Syrian Refugees, with the long term goal of raising $100 thousand and bringing two more refugee families to Antigonish

Are Student Politics a Popularity Contest?

Take the ballot. Mark the box. Chances are you, like so many of us, are not entirely familiar with the platform you are supporting but still feel confident you’re making the right choice. You think he or she will do a good job in x position: you know them personally, they’re outgoing, talented, and a person you’re happy to be acquainted with. Of course, you trust your own character judgment, which compels you to make a decision like voting for your friend in the upcoming student election. 

Now here’s the thing: what if we all did that? Gave into our bias and voted for a friend, but not necessarily for the person who is the best equipped or qualified for the position they are running for. 

If we simply choose the person we trust and know the best, is the election still a fair contest of charisma and leadership skill? Or, at that point, is it simply a popularity contest? More importantly, how does this affect our school and the Students’ Union’s platforms?

From my point of view, most elections, especially those in a small community, are simply matters of popularity. It makes sense. If people love you, they will elect you their leader. This is something that I think most people who went through high school noticed – there was a strange correlation between one’s participation in Student Council and his or her social ties. If you were pop, you were prez. It was rattling for me back then. In reality, however, I’m not sure it was actually such a big deal. I look back on all four years of my high school career with equal amounts of disdain and indifference, but frankly they were all the exact same, or at least very similar. What I take from this, in reflection, is that even if the elections back than were based off popularity - and they were, mark my words - it really did not make any difference in everyday life. 

In my three semesters spent at StFX thus far, I look back on my time here in a somewhat more positive light. The community is certainly more mature, but I dare say we are still subject to the same biases. Frankly, when I asked a few students who they were voting for as Vice-President -since the President is essentially pre-determined - most gave somewhat different answers, but generally the reason was the same: they knew the candidate. 

So while we are all mostly voting for the person we are most comfortable with and trusting of - the candidate we share the closest interpersonal relationship with - how detrimental is that to our school and the Students’ Union? 

When I look back to my frosh year, I didn’t really pay much mind to the U or who was running it. I thought the programs they put on where great, but I was under a veil, a fish fresh out of the pond thrown into the ocean. Everything about StFX was so awesome, simply because it was something new to chew on. For that reason, I can’t really say that who was running the U last year had any effect on my thoughts of the school. 

This year, having been habituated to life around here a bit more, I’m now in a better position to critique, ever so slightly, how this place is managed. As in high school, I feel like when you get down to the nitty gritty, the platforms are all so similar that it doesn’t make a difference who you elect so long as they are the slightest bit competent – or at least that’s what I’ve seen so far. This year has been just as good for me, maybe even slightly better than last year, but I feel like the government of the U has not had much of an effect on this improvement.   

So perhaps yes, when voting in these small, closed community elections we are subject to some bias. Perhaps in the end, it really is just a matter of the candidates’ social network that really pulls in the votes. And to that I say so what? So far this year the U has gotten us a new convenience store in the SUB, which, as opposed to having two outlets that sell clothing, is a huge improvement. At the very least, I do not believe anything crucial to student life has been slashed. So if those who were elected last year were elected out of popularity I would be one to argue that it has not been detrimental to the school. 

Alongside that, the individual I’m putting my money on to win this year is definitely the most popular of the three choices. Without naming said individual, I can’t actually say he or she would do a bad job, because from what I’ve seen of their performance, they seem more than capable of taking on the position. 

This leads me to believe that perhaps being more socially affluent or popular isn’t a bad thing for someone holding such a position. They would certainly be highly sociable, and if people in a community such as ours seem to like them then there must be a reason for it. The only downfall would be that others who may be equally or even better suited for the role may not have the chance to acquire it, due to being caught in the shadow of those more connected. 

I feel like that’s just part of how human society works though, and since the problem is not going anywhere, nor does it seem to cause much harm, I will finish on this note. My proposed solution is simple: vote for whomever you feel truly deserves the position. Whether it be friend, acquaintance, or someone you don’t even know. Often times, our leaders are not chosen, they simply are.

What we’ll tell our grandkids

Canada was once the international community’s poster child for ice hockey (although that was tossed out the window during the World Juniors) however this years diversified successes helped cultivate an evolved athletic culture we now identify with. 2015 was an explosive year for Canadian sports however some moments mark it as particularly triumphant for our over friendly population. 

Connor McDavid was drafted first over all in the 2015 NHL draft to the Edmonton Oilers. The forward is a stunning presence on the the ice only rivalling the entrance into the pros to that of Crosby’s. The next most exciting day for Edmonton will probably be McDavid’s return to line post broken collar bone recovery. 

Canadian basketball’s great one retired: Steve Nash. There is no denying his unbelievable talent, with two MVP trophies to back up his 19 year career, however his greatest impact might be that which has served as a role model and mentor for Basketball Canada. Although we shed a tear as we saidgoodbye to Nash, we should be comforted knowing his legacy will live on in the form of Toronto native Andrew Wiggins. The Timberland forward was drafted first overall in 2014 (which has only been done by one other Canadian), has stats rivalling that of Kevin Durant and Lebron James and won NBA rookie of the year in 2015, the only Canadian to acquire such title. 

Finally, there is not a moment inside an arena that ignites a Canadian’s heart more than the Jose Bautista bat flip. Toronto does not possess a positive reputation in any societal branch among Canadians, however by late summer of 2015 the Blue Jays were our baby and like most moms on Facebook we were flooding our friends on social media with images to point out just how special our child was. It was a romantic tale from Kawasaki’s hilarious interviews, to Josh Donaldson winning the American League’s most valuable player award and late comebacks against the Texas Rangers. The only part missing was a spot in the World Series, but nonetheless the Jays run sent a surge of pride and optimism through the country, stamped with the hashtag “come together.” 

A new year is upon us and so is the chance to dominate an even wider range of sports. In 2016, we can look forward to a comeback from Genie Bouchard, further success from golfer Brooke Henderson on the LPGA and medals at the Rio Olympics from track stars like 800m Melissa Bishop and sprinter Andre De Grasse.